Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 00:41

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Chinese EV Makers Pull Away From Tesla With Sales Gains - Barron's
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
What is a good way to conduct an interview?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Simone Biles spars with Riley Gaines on social media over trans athlete debate - New York Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Scientists visualize key protein structures linked to immune response and inflammation - Phys.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘Titan: The OceanGate Disaster’ Review: The Horrors of Hubris on Netflix - WSJ